You are here:

Cracks

Name: Cracks
Director: Jordan Scott
Released: 2009
Duration: 104 min

Representation Score

6.8/10

Good

2009

Director

Jordan Scott

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Cracks is a psychologically complex period drama that deconstructs traditional social hierarchies. It places women in roles of intellect and authority, moving beyond simple maternal clichés to explore volatile power structures. The film's strength lies in its non-traditional gender dynamics and its critique of traditional institutions through psychological decay. However, it is limited by its historical setting, which results in a lack of racial and ethnic diversity. Additionally, it uses psychological instability as a thriller device rather than providing nuanced disability representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Cracks have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film centers on intense, homoerotic tension between Miss Gordell and her students. This approach challenges traditional expectations of female mentorship and social interactions.

How does Cracks portray gender?

Excellent

Women hold every position of power and play a significant role in driving the story. The film subverts traditional maternal archetypes by presenting educators as figures of psychological instability.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Cracks?

Minimal

Reflecting its 1930s setting, the cast is predominantly white and upper-class. The narrative does not include diverse characters to disrupt historical homogeneity.

How does Cracks represent religion and culture?

Good

The story critiques traditional Western institutions by portraying the boarding school as a site of psychological decay. It explores moral relativism through characters navigating deception and social manipulation.

Does Cracks include disability representation?

Fair

Psychological fragility is used primarily as a thematic tool for the thriller's mystery. There is no explicit representation of neurodivergence or chronic illness.

Present on Screen

Places women in every position of power and ability to act, challenging traditional gender hierarchies.
Explores complex, non-traditional dynamics through intense, homoerotic subtext.
Critiques the stability of traditional institutions by portraying them as sites of psychological decay.

Limited or Absent

Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a homogeneous 1930s upper-class demographic.
Uses psychological instability as a thriller device rather than providing ability to act-driven disability representation.

Official Synopsis

Jealousy flares after the headmistress of an elite boarding school for girls becomes obsessed with a new student.

How are these scores produced? →