
Vicious
2019

2017
Director
Michael Boucherie
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Six people bound together by a traumatic experience decide to round off a year of group therapy in style. They join each other once more, traveling up to the Scottish Lowlands for a reunion weekend in a 1970s holiday let. Soon a number of mysterious and horrifying events start to expose the cracks in their relationships, and one by one they discover that trust runs but skin-deep. A night of closure turns out to be far more final than they could have anticipated.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a conventional romantic framework. It avoids derogatory tropes but does not center on non-heteronormative identities or subvert heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The narrative disrupts traditional gender hierarchies through the interpersonal dynamics of Marie and Benjamin. This approach allows for a nuanced portrayal of masculinity and femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast appears relatively homogeneous, lacking significant racial or ethnic blending. The story focuses on internal psychological landscapes rather than multicultural dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film prioritizes a secular, psychological exploration of human connection. It subtly challenges societal norms by framing neurotypical expectations as potentially alienating systems.
Disability Representation
The film excels by centering a high-functioning autistic protagonist. It avoids 'inspiration porn,' instead focusing on the authentic sensory and social realities of autism.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Where the Skin Lies succeeds primarily through its sophisticated and respectful handling of neurodiversity. By centering Benjamin, a high-functioning autistic protagonist, the film provides a rare, authentic lens on sensory and social processing. It treats neurodivergence as a fundamental way of perceiving the world rather than a mere plot device. However, the film lacks breadth in other areas of intersectionality. The cast is relatively homogeneous, and the narrative does not actively engage with LGBTQ+ identities or diverse racial backgrounds. This creates a narrow focus that, while deep in its specific subject matter, lacks broader social variety. Ultimately, the film is a specialized character study. It trades wide-reaching demographic representation for a deep, nuanced deconstruction of standard interpersonal communication and social norms.

2019

2020

2017

2017

2014

2015

2013

2015

2015

2018

2015

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.