New Showbiz
You are here:

Thinking XXX

Thinking XXX

Representation Score

6.8/10

Good

2004

NR

Director

Timothy Greenfield-Sanders

Runtime

58 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This film stands out by examining its subjects with a deep understanding rather than mere curiosity. By emphasizing the intellectual and economic independence of adult performers, the documentary brings humanity to a underrepresented community. The film effectively dismantles traditional social structures and Western institutional norms. It uses portraits to explore how systemic pressures affect the daily lives of those in the industry. While the film offers a diverse range of perspectives, it primarily focuses on the specific professional subculture of adult film performers.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Thinking XXX have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film allows performers to share personal stories about their non-traditional gender experiences. It focuses on the intersection of identity and work rather than using LGBTQ+ issues as a spectacle.

How does Thinking XXX portray gender?

Good

Performers are shown as individuals with their own thoughts and financial independence, rather than just objects. The film discusses the tension between personal identity and traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Thinking XXX?

Good

The cast includes performers from various ethnic backgrounds, preventing a uniform portrayal of the adult industry.

How does Thinking XXX represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques traditional Western institutions by showing how legal and capitalist systems can be oppressive. Figures like John Waters provide a modern critique of societal norms.

Does Thinking XXX include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no depiction or mention of physical or cognitive disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

  • Focuses on the intellectual depth and independence of performers rather than sensationalism.
  • Highlights economic and personal autonomy to challenge traditional gender hierarchies.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of social norms and institutional authority.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not include visible representation or discussion of physical or cognitive disabilities.
  • Remains focused on the specific professional subculture of adult film performers.

Official Synopsis

For a book project, photographer Timothy Greenfield-Sanders took photographs of 30 stars of adult movies, each pair of photographs in the same pose, clothed and nude. This film records the photo shoots and includes interviews with the performers and commentary from eight writers (and John Waters). The actors and writers discuss economics, nudity and exhibitionism, careers, and private lives.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.