You are here:

Shooting Porn

Shooting Porn

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

1997

NC-17

Director

Ronnie Larsen

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Shooting Porn serves as a specialized study of the adult industry, offering visibility to queer identities and challenging social taboos. However, its focus on a niche subject matter limits its broader impact. The film emphasizes male performers and industry secrets, which skews the representation towards a masculine-centric framework. While it provides a unique cultural perspective, it falls short in representing a diverse range of demographics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Shooting Porn have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film highlights queer identities within the adult entertainment industry, featuring performers like Rip Stone, who provides a nuanced view of sexual identity and performance.

How does Shooting Porn portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers around male performers and industry directors, emphasizing a masculine-focused hierarchy despite featuring female performer Chi Chi LaRue.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Shooting Porn?

Limited

The film does not include significant racial diversity or representation from non-Anglo-Saxon backgrounds, focusing instead on the inner workings of the industry.

How does Shooting Porn represent religion and culture?

Good

By providing a platform for a stigmatized industry, the documentary challenges Western institutional morality, prioritizing an insider perspective over traditional social or religious critiques.

Does Shooting Porn include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no indication of the portrayal of individuals with visible or invisible disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

  • Provides meaningful visibility into queer identities and professional sexual performance.
  • Challenges traditional Western moralities with a non-judgmental, observational approach.
  • Offers a rare insider perspective on a stigmatized professional subculture.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity among the cast and subjects.
  • The narrative focuses heavily on masculine-centric industry hierarchies.
  • Does not provide representation for individuals with visible or invisible disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Director Ronnie Larsen interviews some of the most popular people working in porn, focusing closely on two of the industry's top directors: Gino Colbert and Chi Chi LaRue. Larsen follows Colbert and LaRue on video shoots and to porn events and functions (including the AVN Awards). Various performers are given identities as well, including Bryan Kidd, Rip Stone (a gay-for-pay model), Jordan Young, Hunter Scott (who demonstrates the proper way to give yourself an enema), and Blue Blake. While the performers are given voices, writers Mickey Skee and David Widmer are given faces and provide fascinating exposition (including how much the boys are paid), spilling some industry "secrets."

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.