You are here:
Choke Canyon

Choke Canyon

1986

PG

Director

Charles Bail

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Pilgrim Corporation has leased Choke Canyon to research physicist David Lowell for 99 years. Lowell has built an impressive research laboratory there. When Pilgrim suddenly needs Choke Canyon for toxic waste storage, they resort to violence to force out the renitent Lowell. However, Pilgrim Corportation vastly underestimates Lowell, who is a tenacious, principled, and ingenious man.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.4/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. It appears to follow a traditional, heteronormative narrative structure.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story centers on a male protagonist defined by tenacity and ingenuity. This reinforces traditional masculine leadership tropes and the 'competent man' archetype.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

There is no indication of a non-white majority cast or diverse ethnic perspectives. The narrative follows a conventional framework focused on a singular protagonist.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film offers a moderate critique of corporate power and industrial greed. It frames the Pilgrim Corporation as a predatory force against scientific integrity.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The available information provides no evidence of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • Provides a critique of corporate power and industrial utility.
  • Features a principled protagonist fighting for scientific integrity.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks meaningful LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Relies on traditional masculine leadership tropes and archetypes.
  • Shows no evidence of racial, ethnic, or disability-based diversity.

AI Analysis

Choke Canyon is a genre-driven action-sci-fi film that relies heavily on mid-1980s tropes. The narrative is built around a singular, heroic masculine archetype, prioritizing individualistic conflict over identity-driven storytelling. While the film provides a critique of corporate hegemony and institutional corruption, it does so through a very traditional lens. The struggle between the principled scientist and the predatory corporation lacks intersectional depth or social subversion. Ultimately, the film functions as a standard struggle of individual agency against a corrupt institution, offering little in the way of diverse representation or nuanced social commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.