
Donkey's Hide
1982

1971
Director
Nadezhda Kosheverova
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The good-natured scholar Christian-Theodore arrives in a small country where miracles occur. He falls in love with the beautiful Princess, whose marriage is a matter of national importance, because her husband will become the new king. But unlike many “suitors”, selfish thoughts are alien to Christian-Theodore. He is sincerely fascinated by her beauty and releases his Shadow, hoping to get a faithful helper in his quest to marry the Princess. But the Shadow is the embodiment of egoism, greed and meanness. Quickly betraying the scholar, he marries the Princess himself and takes the royal throne.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story focuses on a romantic pursuit between a scholar and a princess. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or queer themes within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The Princess holds significant political agency, as her marriage determines national stability. However, she primarily functions as the object of conflict within a traditional romantic structure.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set in a fantasy realm, the film likely reflects the homogeneous ethnic composition typical of 1971 Soviet folklore. The narrative lacks intentional racial blending.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a strong critique of traditional power structures and royal legitimacy. It prioritizes a philosophical exploration of egoism over simple, traditional morality.
Disability Representation
The narrative contains no evidence of characters possessing visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Ten is a moral allegory that uses fantasy to explore the corrupting nature of greed. It succeeds in subverting traditional heroic tropes by allowing a personified shadow to triumph over the virtuous protagonist. While the film provides a sophisticated psychological critique of power, it remains limited in its demographic breadth. The focus is almost entirely on the internal struggle of the scholar and the moral implications of his shadow. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its philosophical depth rather than its intersectional representation. It trades diverse character archetypes for a concentrated study of human egoism.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.