
Last Known Address
1970

1981
Director
José Giovanni
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The "black robe" in the title of this suspense film belongs to a female lawyer, Florence Nat who has just lost a case in which she defended Simon Risler, a man wrongly accused of murder. Risler escapes before he can be put in prison, and seeks help from attorney Nat in finding the real killer, partly by going after the police inspector who framed him in the first place. A retired surgeon, in the process of setting up a drug rehab clinic gets involved in solving Risler's case, and soon the solution seems to be pointing to high-ranking figures with every desire and ample means to keep the truth well-hidden.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses strictly on a legal and criminal procedural framework involving the main protagonists.
Gender Representation
Florence Nat provides a strong subversion of gender hierarchies. As a female lawyer, she possesses professional agency and serves as a central driver of the plot.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative appears focused on homogeneous French institutional and criminal structures. There is no evidence of multicultural character arcs or diverse casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sharp critique of systemic corruption. It depicts high-ranking figures as architects of injustice, challenging the integrity of established power structures.
Disability Representation
There are no identifiable depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The retired surgeon's role relates to medical rehabilitation rather than disability agency.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film stands out for its progressive approach to gender, placing a female lawyer at the heart of a high-stakes legal thriller. This agency challenges the typical male-dominated tropes of the crime genre. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. The narrative is centered on a homogeneous French setting, offering little in the way of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its institutional critique. It uses its plot to deconstruct the reliability of law and order, favoring situational ethics over systemic stability.

1970

1990

1997

1976

1989

1987

1966

1985

1985

1961

1985

2022
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.