New Showbiz

You are here:
Nakom

Nakom

2016

Director

T.W. Pittman, Kelly Daniela Norris

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Upon his father's sudden death, a talented medical student returns to his home village in Ghana to fight for his family's survival.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks discernible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The story focuses primarily on communal and familial survival in a rural setting.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on a male protagonist managing family affairs after his father's death. It remains unclear if the film critiques or reinforces traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

By centering on a rural Ghanaian community, the film disrupts Western-centric cinematic gazes. It prioritizes indigenous perspectives and local agency through its specific setting and casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The mockumentary style engages with subjective morality and local traditions. However, the film lacks explicit evidence of secularist or anti-capitalist themes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative does not address neurodivergence or chronic illness.

Strengths

  • Strong racial and ethnic centering through its Ghanaian setting.
  • Disrupts Western-centric cinematic norms by prioritizing indigenous agency.
  • Utilizes a postmodern mockumentary format to explore subjective truth.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of intersectional representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Absence of characters or narratives addressing disability and neurodivergence.
  • Limited evidence of gender subversion or female agency within the story.

AI Analysis

Nakom succeeds as a culturally specific work that centers Ghanaian life, effectively moving the narrative lens away from Western-centric perspectives. This intentionality provides a strong foundation for racial and ethnic representation. However, the film lacks intersectional breadth. The absence of visible LGBTQ+ representation, disability narratives, or clear evidence of gender subversion limits its overall diversity impact. Ultimately, while the film excels in geographic and ethnic centering, it remains a narrow study of traditional familial roles and communal survival.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom

Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom

2019

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.