The Sex Machine
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
How to Make a Doll
1968
Director
Herschell Gordon Lewis
Runtime
78 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A nerdy professor who has no luck with women builds beautiful female robots to satisfy his sexual desires.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.3/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on heteronormative sexual desire. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or critiques of traditional sexual norms.
Gender Representation
Women are depicted as robots built to satisfy a male protagonist's desires. This framework lacks female agency and reinforces a hierarchy of objectification.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative lacks evidence of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast. It appears to follow the homogeneous casting patterns typical of 1968 exploitation cinema.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story centers on individualistic desire and technological solutions for gratification. It lacks any significant anti-Western or secularist critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the inclusion or depiction of neurodivergence or physical disabilities in this film.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks female agency, instead using women as objects for male gratification.
- There is a complete absence of racial and ethnic diversity in the narrative.
- The story fails to include any LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative perspectives.
- The narrative lacks any meaningful representation of disability or neurodivergence.
AI Analysis
How to Make a Doll functions as a mid-century exploitation narrative that prioritizes genre tropes over social commentary. The central premise relies on the objectification of women, presenting them as passive tools for male gratification rather than autonomous characters. The film lacks intersectional complexity and fails to challenge traditional power hierarchies. Its focus on a male protagonist's unchecked desires reinforces standard, non-subversive gender dynamics and heteronormative structures. Ultimately, the work lacks diverse representation, adhering to the homogeneous and traditionalist storytelling patterns common in the exploitation genre of its era.
Similar Movies
Wam Bam Thank You Spaceman
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Dr. Sex
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Over-Sexed Rugsuckers from Mars
1989
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
M.O.P.Z.
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
The Erotic Misadventures of the Invisible Man
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
The 30 Foot Bride of Candy Rock
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Cinderella 2000
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Sex Is Crazy
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Play-Mate of the Apes
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
I Killed Einstein, Gentlemen
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
You Are a Widow, Sir
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.