You are here:

How to Make a Doll

How to Make a Doll

Representation Score

0.9/10

Minimal

1968

Not Rated

Director

Herschell Gordon Lewis

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

How to Make a Doll operates as a mid-century exploitation narrative that emphasizes genre clichés over social commentary. The central premise relies on the objectification of women, presenting them as passive tools for male gratification rather than autonomous characters. The film lacks complexity in reflecting multiple aspects of identity and fails to challenge traditional power hierarchies. Its focus on a male protagonist's unchecked desires reinforces conventional gender dynamics and assumptions about straight relationships. Ultimately, the work lacks diverse representation, adhering to the homogeneous and traditional storytelling patterns common in the exploitation genre of its era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does How to Make a Doll have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and does not include any non-cisgender identities or critiques of traditional sexual norms.

How does How to Make a Doll portray gender?

Minimal

Women are portrayed as objects designed to fulfill the desires of a male protagonist, lacking autonomy and reinforcing a hierarchy where women are objectified.

How racially and ethnically diverse is How to Make a Doll?

Minimal

The narrative lacks diversity and follows the homogeneous casting patterns typical of 1968 exploitation cinema.

How does How to Make a Doll represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story centers on individual desires and technological solutions, without any significant critiques of Western or secularist values.

Does How to Make a Doll include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the inclusion or depiction of neurodivergence or physical disabilities in this film.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks women's ability to drive the story, instead using women as objects for male gratification.
  • There is a complete absence of racial and ethnic diversity in the narrative.
  • The story fails to include any LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender perspectives.
  • The narrative lacks any meaningful representation of disability or neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

A nerdy, unlucky professor builds beautiful female robots to satisfy his sexual desires.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.