
Classe Z
2017

2012
RDirector
Matthew McManus, Kevin McManus
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
It's always a good day for a funeral at St. Mark's Middle School. Andy and Charlie, two altar servers, don't just get to miss class anytime a parishioner kicks the bucket, they cut out early and play hooky as soon as the service is over. Eventually their irreverent personalities will put them in a situation that is too big for them to handle.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film utilizes a surrealist aesthetic that incorporates queer-coded elements and non-normative traits. While explicit depictions of same-sex intimacy are not documented, the atmosphere suggests a departure from heteronormative structures.
Gender Representation
By centering on misfit characters and eccentric dynamics, the film disrupts conventional social roles. It avoids reinforcing standard gender hierarchies by focusing on outcasts rather than traditional archetypes of leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no significant evidence of a non-white majority cast or intentional race-bent casting. The film focuses on a localized setting that does not prioritize intersectional racial dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques the sanctity of religious institutions through irreverent altar servers. It prioritizes individualistic, non-conformist identities over traditional civic or religious duties.
Disability Representation
Characters are framed through the lens of social alienation and eccentricity. While this allows for neurodivergent-coded behavior, there is no confirmed evidence of specific, agency-driven depictions of physical disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Funeral Kings operates as a postmodernist critique of authority, using a surrealist framework to elevate the social outsider. It succeeds in disrupting institutional morality and traditional social structures through its irreverent tone. However, the film lacks high-visibility markers for diversity. It relies heavily on subtext and themes of 'otherness' rather than explicit, documented representation of specific marginalized identities. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its rejection of mainstream narrative conventions, though it remains limited in its intersectional breadth.

2017

2014

2016

2004

2010

2016

2011

2012

1971

2007

1987

2026
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.