
Emmanuel Macron: Behind the Rise
2017

2018
Director
Håvard Bustnes
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The key male members of the far-right political party Golden Dawn are imprisoned accused of carrying out organized criminal activity. To maintain Golden Dawn's position as the fifth largest political party in Greece, their daughters, wives and mothers step up to the task of leading the party through the upcoming elections.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the domestic and familial structures of a far-right movement. It lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that critique heteronormativity, instead documenting the reinforcement of traditional patriarchal units.
Gender Representation
Women step into positions of political agency to maintain the party's viability. However, this leadership serves to preserve a conservative framework rather than subverting gender hierarchies for progressive values.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentary centers on a specific Greek political context. It lacks evidence of intersectional racial blending or perspectives that challenge the homogeneity of the subject group.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative documents the preservation of a specific nationalist and traditionalist political identity. It functions as a study of traditionalist resilience rather than a critique of systemic oppression.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Golden Dawn Girls offers a sociological look at how a far-right political organization maintains continuity through familial networks. The film captures a unique moment where women—mothers, wives, and daughters—assume leadership roles to sustain the party following the imprisonment of its male members. While the film highlights women gaining political agency, this shift does not represent a progressive movement. Instead, these women operate within a highly conservative framework to preserve the existing ideological status quo. The documentary serves more as an observation of traditionalist adaptation than a challenge to social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film is deeply rooted in a specific nationalist identity. It lacks intersectional breadth, focusing instead on the survival of a homogeneous political structure through traditional family units.

2017

2017

2020

2016

2016

2017

2016

2020

2014

2018

2012

2003
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.