Howlings in Favour of De Sade
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Return to Reason
1923
Director
Man Ray
Runtime
3 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Experimental film, white specks and shapes gyrating over a black background, the light-striped torso of Kiki of Montparnasse (Alice Prin), a gyrating eggcrate. One of the first Dadaist films.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.9/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit queer romance or identity narratives. However, the presence of Kiki of Montparnasse introduces a non-traditional gaze that disrupts heteronormative romantic tropes.
Gender Representation
Man Ray subverts gender hierarchies by deconstructing the female form through abstraction. The subject is treated as a kinetic, geometric element rather than a passive object of domesticity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the frame. The work focuses on abstract shapes and a singular, non-diverse subject.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film serves as a critique of Western rationalism and Enlightenment values. Its Dadaist absurdity rejects the capitalist and social orders of the early 20th century.
Disability Representation
As an experimental work of light and shapes, there are no characters or depictions related to disability.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by deconstructing the female form through abstraction.
- Challenges Western rationalism and Enlightenment values through Dadaist absurdity.
- Disrupts heteronormative tropes by utilizing a non-traditional gaze.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks racial and ethnic diversity within the visual frame.
- Does not provide explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identity or romance.
- Provides no representation of disability or diverse human experiences.
AI Analysis
Return to Reason is a radical Dadaist experiment that prioritizes surrealist form over traditional storytelling. It succeeds in dismantling conventional cinematic structures and challenging the 'male gaze' through the abstraction of the female body. However, the film's impact is limited by a lack of demographic breadth. The absence of racial or ethnic diversity and the lack of explicit LGBTQ+ narratives result in a lower overall score despite its intellectual depth. Ultimately, the work functions as a powerful critique of Western logic and social hierarchies, even if it remains narrow in its human representation.
Similar Movies
Autumn Mists
1929
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Anemic Cinema
1926
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Train of Shadows
1997
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
A Movie
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Goodbye to Language
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
Venom and Eternity
1951
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.9 out of 10
Five Minutes of Pure Cinema
1926
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.0 out of 10
I, an Actress
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.2 out of 10
Nocturne 29
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
The Seashell and the Clergyman
1928
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
Pas de Deux
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.