You are here:
Dogs: The Rise and Fall of an All-Girl Bookie Joint

Dogs: The Rise and Fall of an All-Girl Bookie Joint

1997

R

Director

Eve Annenberg

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Four twenty-something women, crammed into a small Manhattan apartment, have dead end jobs (or no job) and overdue rent. They discover cash and self esteem when they set up an illegal bookie joint in their kitchen. Suddenly they can pay their bills; they imagine joining the middle class; they even make corporate donations to charity. The film also explores their relationships with men, most of whom are unfit for anything lasting, and with their mothers, who appear in surreal, imagined conversations with their daughters.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.5/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on the protagonists' relationships with men, who are described as unfit for lasting connections. There is no explicit mention of queer identities or non-heteronormative romantic arcs.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The film centers four women who achieve economic agency through an illegal enterprise. It subverts traditional tropes by framing men as unstable rather than competent providers.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

While the Manhattan setting implies a multicultural environment, the text provides no specific details regarding the racial or ethnic identities of the characters.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story critiques capitalist structures through the characters' struggle with rent and employment. Surreal conversations with mothers also deconstruct traditional domestic and family units.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The available information contains no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on female economic agency and autonomy.
  • Subversion of traditional male provider tropes.
  • Critique of capitalist pressures and working-class struggles.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or queer character arcs.
  • Absence of specific details regarding racial and ethnic diversity.
  • No mention of characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film stands out for its subversion of gendered power dynamics, placing women in roles of financial and strategic leadership. By centering female economic agency, it moves away from traditional male-centric crime narratives. However, the work lacks explicit representation regarding LGBTQ+ identities and specific racial backgrounds. While the urban setting suggests diversity, the narrative does not provide concrete evidence of intersectional casting. Ultimately, the film offers a progressive framework for its era by critiquing economic structures and deconstructing the traditional family unit through psychological, surrealist elements.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.