
Me, Myself & Irene
2000

1991
PGDirector
Frank Oz
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Before going on vacation, self-involved psychiatrist Dr. Leo Marvin has the misfortune of taking on a new patient: Bob Wiley. An exemplar of neediness and a compendium of phobias, Bob follows Marvin to his family's country house. Dr. Marvin tries to get him to leave; the trouble is, everyone loves Bob. As his oblivious patient makes himself at home, Dr. Marvin loses his professional composure and, before long, may be ready for the loony bin himself.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters and does not explore non-heteronormative identities. Interpersonal dynamics remain strictly within a heteronormative framework.
Gender Representation
The narrative follows traditional domestic structures. The female lead often serves as a mediator between the male protagonist's rigidity and the chaos of the antagonist.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting is a homogeneous, white, upper-middle-class environment. There is a notable absence of racial diversity among the primary and supporting cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story maintains a traditional Western framework centered on social decorum and the nuclear family. It avoids critiques of Western or capitalist norms.
Disability Representation
Bob Wiley’s psychological instability and phobias drive the plot. However, his neurodivergence is used primarily for comedic exploitation rather than nuanced representation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
What About Bob? is a character-driven comedy that prioritizes psychological friction over social or identity-based exploration. The film functions as a conventional comedy of manners, focusing on the tension between social order and individual neurosis. The narrative architecture relies heavily on traditional Western social norms and a homogeneous demographic. This results in a lack of intersectional depth, as the story centers on the socioeconomic stability of the established professional class. While the film provides a central role for a character with mental health challenges, it uses these traits as a comedic device. The focus remains on the protagonist's loss of control rather than a meaningful exploration of disability.

2000

1968

2003

1987

1981

1988

1989

2010

1980

1994

1986

1988
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.