You are here:
Stuff for the Rich

Stuff for the Rich

1987

Director

Sergio Corbucci

Runtime

106 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

3 episodes set in Monte Carlo. In the first one a priest is compelled to become the lover of a princess. In the second, a con woman tries to cheat an insurance man. In the third, a man has to deal with his wife's suicidal attempts.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film explores a priest entering a romantic arrangement with a princess. This focuses on the transgression of clerical vows rather than the exploration of queer identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters appear through archetypes like a con woman and a volatile wife. These roles lean on deception and instability rather than subverting gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Set in Monte Carlo, the film reflects the homogeneous social strata of 1980s European high society. There is no evidence of diverse ethnic casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative uses situational ethics and moral relativism for humor. It depicts a priest in a secular role but does not critique Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film contains no characters with visible or invisible disabilities. There is no representation of neurodivergence or mental health conditions.

Strengths

  • Uses situational irony to challenge singular religious morality through comedic character choices.
  • Features female characters with agency, albeit through the lens of deception and chaos.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of non-heteronormative identities or queer-focused narratives.
  • Fails to include diverse racial or ethnic perspectives within its European setting.
  • Provides no representation of characters with disabilities or neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

Stuff for the Rich operates as a traditional episodic comedy centered on the eccentricities of the wealthy in Monte Carlo. The narrative relies on situational irony and the subversion of social roles, such as a priest engaging in a romantic affair, to drive its humor. While the film touches on moral relativism, it lacks the intersectional complexity needed to challenge established social hierarchies. The characterizations follow established genre tropes rather than offering deep social commentary. Ultimately, the production reflects the homogeneous and conventional social frameworks typical of 1980s European commercial cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.