
Code Name Coq Rouge
1989

1992
Director
Per Berglund
Runtime
96 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The West German security police, Verfassungsschutz, need help to infiltrate a group connected to the Rote Arme Fraktion. The Swedish James Bond, Carl Hamilton, goes to Hamburg, pretending to be a Swedish officer, thrown out of the country after having been exposed as an East German spy. He gets in contact with the terrorists and joins them. Together they are planning to strike against the CIA headquarters in Stockholm.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It operates within the traditional parameters of 1990s espionage, focusing on geopolitical conflict rather than identity-based exploration.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on Carl Hamilton, a male protagonist embodying traditional masculine spy archetypes. Primary agency is attributed to male figures, reinforcing conventional gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting suggests a predominantly Eurocentric cast involving West German, Swedish, and East German actors. There is no indication of a non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film engages with themes that challenge Western institutional stability. By centering the Red Army Faction, it disrupts patriotic narratives and critiques state security apparatuses.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible information regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Democratic Terrorist is a genre-driven geopolitical thriller that prioritizes political friction over social identity. It follows a male-centric espionage plot involving the Red Army Faction and intelligence agencies. While the film lacks intersectional representation regarding gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities, it finds strength in its cultural critique. It avoids simple patriotic tropes by framing state institutions as entities in conflict with radical dissidents. Ultimately, the film reflects the era's focus on international power dynamics and masculine archetypes rather than diverse social representation.

1989

1970

1997

1989

1988

1993

2012

2015

2015

1984

2004

1977
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.