You are here:

...So Goes the Nation

...So Goes the Nation

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

2006

Not Rated

Director

Adam Del Deo, James D. Stern

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary serves as a journalistic account of the 2004 Presidential Election in Ohio. Its main objective is to analyze electoral processes and sociological trends rather than character-driven narratives based on identity. The film operates within established political structures, showing how different groups engage with the democratic process. It functions as a report on current social realities rather than a means to challenge traditional hierarchies. Given its focus on political strategy and regional voter behavior, representation of specific identity groups is secondary to the broader political narrative.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does ...So Goes the Nation have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on the broader political changes and voting blocs rather than individual LGBTQ+ stories. Representation seems secondary to the overall political coverage of the 2004 election cycle.

How does ...So Goes the Nation portray gender?

Fair

The narrative highlights traditional gender roles in American political campaigning. It does not delve into the dynamics of gendered power or female political influence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is ...So Goes the Nation?

Fair

The documentary examines how race intersects with voting behavior among Ohio’s diverse populations. It serves as a journalistic observation of current realities rather than a critique of racial hierarchies.

How does ...So Goes the Nation represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores patriotism and civic engagement within Western democratic systems. It documents the functioning of these institutions during a time of heightened national division.

Does ...So Goes the Nation include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no clear depiction of physical or neurodivergent identities. The focus remains solely on the mechanics of the election.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a documented look at how race intersects with voting behavior in a key swing state.
  • Provides a clear study of civic engagement and the tension between competing political ideologies.

Limited or Absent

  • Could benefit from a more intentional focus on individual LGBTQ+ narratives or specific queer political experiences.
  • Would improve by actively examining gendered power dynamics or racial hierarchies within the political landscape.
  • Could include more representation or narrative focus on disability or neurodivergent identities.

Official Synopsis

A look at the role of the Buckeye State in the 2004 Presidential Election.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.