You are here:

The Siege at Thorn High

Name: The Siege at Thorn High
Director: Joko Anwar
Released: 2025
Duration: 118 min

2025

Director

Joko Anwar

Runtime

118 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Edwin promised to his sister on her deathbed to find her son she gave up a long time ago. Edwin's quest brought him to become a substitute teacher in Duri High School, Jakarta, a school for juvenile delinquents. There he must face the most violent students to find his nephew. When he eventually finds the boy, a city-wide riot erupts and Edwin is trapped in the school with the cruel kids out for his blood.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

7.4/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit documentation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex romantic arcs. While the dystopian setting may challenge heteronormativity, the narrative focus remains on ethnic and class-based tensions.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot is driven by the trauma and agency of Silvi, whose survival catalyzes the story. However, the central conflict involves male-dominated hierarchies of violence and a male protagonist.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated critique of racial hierarchies by centering on anti-Chinese discrimination. It uses the historical trauma of the 1998 Jakarta riots to ground its dystopian exploration of ethnicity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative deconstructs national stability by portraying a fractured, unstable Indonesia. It critiques the failure of state institutions and explores the impact of historical trauma on a broken society.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no explicit mention of characters navigating physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the provided plot details.

Strengths

Exceptional engagement with intersectional identity and historical racial trauma.
Sophisticated critique of systemic oppression and institutional failure.
Strong connection between historical events and dystopian social commentary.

Areas for Improvement

Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or queer narrative arcs.
Absence of characters navigating physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Gendered conflict leans heavily toward male-dominated hierarchies of violence.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a heavy socio-political thriller that uses a dystopian lens to examine systemic discrimination. It connects historical racial violence to a future of continued instability, making ethnic identity a central narrative pillar. While the film excels in addressing racial and cultural fractures, it lacks specific representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disability. The gender dynamics are somewhat imbalanced, as the driving motivation is female-led while the primary action is male-dominated. Ultimately, the work succeeds as an intersectional study of how historical trauma and systemic oppression persist across generations in a collapsing society.

How are these scores produced? →