You are here:
What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires

What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires

2005

Director

Jemaine Clement, Taika Waititi

Runtime

28 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Three vampires who share an apartment are interviewed by a TV crew.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film features Viago, a flamboyant 19th-century dandy, offering non-traditional gender expression. However, the narrative lacks explicit queer-centric plots or overt romantic subplots involving same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Fair

Masculinity is subverted by portraying ancient predators through domestic incompetence and trivial disputes. This farcical approach replaces stoic, dominant leaders with characters defined by social ineptitude.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Set in Wellington, New Zealand, the film utilizes a localized lens that avoids Hollywood's white-centric horror traditions. The regional setting provides an authenticity that challenges North American cinematic norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The mockumentary format shifts the focus from good versus evil to situational ethics and the banality of existence. Characters operate outside conventional religious or patriotic frameworks.

Disability Representation

Limited

The film lacks meaningful representation of visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by their supernatural status rather than neurodivergence or physical impairment.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional masculine hierarchies by portraying vampires through a lens of domestic incompetence.
  • Utilizes a localized New Zealand setting to challenge North American-centric horror tropes.
  • Deconstructs the 'monster' archetype by focusing on the banality of existence and social alienation.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit, identity-driven narratives regarding LGBTQ+ characters or romantic subplots.
  • Provides no significant or meaningful representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Focuses primarily on a male-centric household, limiting broader intersectional perspectives.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds in deconstructing traditional horror hierarchies by replacing the predator/victim dynamic with a study of domestic dysfunction. It effectively subverts masculine archetypes, presenting powerful creatures as socially inept roommates rather than dominant figures. While the film offers progressive subversions of power and authority, it lacks depth in intersectional representation. There is a notable absence of dedicated narratives surrounding disability or explicit LGBTQ+ identities. Ultimately, the work achieves a unique perspective by prioritizing a secular, nihilistic view of immortality over grand mythic narratives, using its New Zealand setting to provide a non-Anglo-centric atmosphere.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.