You are here:

Candy Jar

Candy Jar

Representation Score

6.0/10

Good

2018

TV-14

Director

Ben Shelton

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Candy Jar stands out as a character-driven drama that emphasizes intellectual ability to act. By focusing on the competitive spirit of two female protagonists, it challenges traditional gender hierarchies where women are often relegated to supporting roles. The film provides a nuanced exploration of how socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds intersect with academic success through its diverse cast. This approach avoids the 'white-as-default' cliché and highlights the achievements of characters from various backgrounds. However, the film falls short in other areas of representation. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ themes and does not offer a critical examination of the institutions it portrays, maintaining a conventional narrative framework.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Candy Jar have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not prominently feature LGBTQ+ identities or relationships as key plot points. Relationships follow traditional heterosexual and platonic norms.

How does Candy Jar portray gender?

Excellent

The story centers on the intellectual competition and professional goals of two women. Samantha and Grace play significant roles in driving the narrative through academic achievements.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Candy Jar?

Good

The film features a diverse cast that avoids a single, homogeneous main character. Diverse characters are placed in positions of academic excellence, moving away from a default white-centric model.

How does Candy Jar represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative unfolds within meritocratic academic settings. It emphasizes individual ambition rather than a specific cultural or religious tradition or institutional critique.

Does Candy Jar include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent representations of disabilities in the film. Disabilities do not serve as central narrative elements.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender hierarchies by highlighting female intellect and ambition.
  • Features a diverse cast that avoids the 'white-as-default' protagonist model.
  • Explores the intersection of socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds with academic success.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or themes.
  • Does not provide a critical examination of the academic institutions portrayed.
  • Minimal representation of disabilities within the narrative.

Official Synopsis

Dueling high school debate champs who are at odds on just about everything forge ahead with ambitious plans to get into the colleges of their dreams.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.