You are here:

Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment

Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment

Representation Score

4.7/10

Fair

2015

Director

Izuru Narushima

Runtime

149 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment is a social drama that emphasizes institutional critique rather than identity politics. The film's strength lies in dismantling power hierarchies, enabling students to challenge teacher and administrator authority. However, the film lacks clear representations of diverse identities. The social environment appears homogeneous, and there is no obvious focus on LGBTQ+ or disability-related narratives. Ultimately, the film's merit is in its postmodern approach to truth, although it remains limited in its demographic range.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film centers on a criminal investigation into a student's death. There are no explicit depictions of non-straight or non-cisgender identities within the story.

How does Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment portray gender?

Fair

Young characters show significant intellectual influence by questioning adult-led structures. This overturning of traditional power dynamics supports meaningful roles for girls and boys in the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment?

Limited

As a Japanese production, the casting reflects the local population. The narrative suggests a fairly uniform social environment within the school setting.

How does Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment represent religion and culture?

Good

The story criticizes institutional corruption by emphasizing personal truth over official doctrine. It examines the flaws of established systems through a student-led tribunal.

Does Solomon's Perjury 2: Judgment include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no specific indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in this production.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional adult-led hierarchies through student influence.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of institutional integrity and systemic issues.
  • Explores the tension between personal truth and official doctrine.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Features a relatively homogeneous racial and ethnic cast.
  • Provides no visible or invisible disability representation.

Official Synopsis

A group of junior high school must find out the truth of their classmate's death is he was killed by someone or committed suicide.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.