You are here:

How to Be

How to Be

Representation Score

6.4/10

Good

2008

NR

Director

Oliver Irving

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

How to Be succeeds as an intellectual study of the individual, using a fragmented narrative to mirror a protagonist's internal fragmentation. Its primary strength lies in deconstructing masculine archetypes by replacing stoicism with profound psychological vulnerability. However, the film functions more as a tool for intellectual subversion than demographic subversion. It remains tethered to a conventional demographic profile, lacking the breadth needed to engage with diverse racial or LGBTQ+ perspectives. Ultimately, the work is a portrait of modern alienation that prioritizes subjective experience over a diverse social landscape.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does How to Be have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film explores identity fluidity and human connection. However, it lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or clear markers that everyone isn't cisgender, offering thematic nuance without overt representation.

How does How to Be portray gender?

Fair

The narrative challenges traditional male stereotypes by focusing on male vulnerability and psychological instability. While it disrupts traditional gender roles, the heavy focus on a single male psyche limits discussions about gender diversity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is How to Be?

Limited

The production features a predominantly white cast within a homogeneous social framework. There is no significant evidence of diverse casting or casting actors in roles that differ from their traditional backgrounds.

How does How to Be represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story favors secular, individualistic existentialism over traditional communal or religious values. It implicitly critiques established social structures through themes of alienation and moral relativism.

Does How to Be include disability representation?

Limited

Mental health is explored through the lens of existential crisis and alienation. These are treated as philosophical conditions rather than empowered depictions of specific disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional masculine stereotypes by focusing on male vulnerability and psychological instability.
  • Uses a postmodern, non-linear narrative structure to challenge traditional cinematic conventions.
  • Offers a complex, nuanced exploration of existentialism and the search for individual meaning.

Limited or Absent

  • Fails to integrate diverse racial or LGBTQ+ perspectives, limiting multi-layered breadth.
  • Maintains a predominantly white and homogeneous social framework throughout the narrative.
  • Treats psychological struggles as philosophical themes rather than empowered depictions of disability.

Official Synopsis

A young man having an existential crisis convinces a Canadian self-help guru to come to London and become his personal life coach.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.