You are here:

Go

Name: Go
Director: Michael Rudnick
Released: 1986
Duration: 3 min

No Poster Available

Representation Score

2.1/10

Limited

1986

Director

Michael Rudnick

Runtime

3 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Go is a postmodern character study that emphasizes fragmented storytelling and the role of chance over identity-focused narratives. The film explores urban coincidence rather than diverse lived experiences. Because the narrative structure centers on traditional social interactions, it adheres to the demographic and social norms of its production era. The film lacks intentional depth in representing diverse identities, resulting in a lower diversity score.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Go have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and urban social interactions. It does not include any non-cisgender identities or narratives that question the assumption that everyone is straight.

How does Go portray gender?

Fair

The story primarily revolves around male-driven plot lines, especially those involving crime. Female characters have their own choices but the film does not challenge traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Go?

Limited

The cast is mostly uniform, representing a specific 1980s New York demographic. There is no significant blending of races within the main character arcs.

How does Go represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film explores urban chaos and coincidence. It does not critique capitalism or systemic oppression, instead presenting anti-social behavior as part of urban disorder.

Does Go include disability representation?

Minimal

No visible or invisible disabilities are shown in the film. Characters are not used as plot devices related to physical or cognitive differences.

Present on Screen

Female characters have their own choices within their specific storylines.
The film provides a unique postmodern look at urban coincidence and chance.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisgender narratives.
Casting is predominantly uniform, lacking racial and ethnic diversity.
There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
The narrative remains centered on male-driven plot lines and traditional gender roles.

Official Synopsis

Short film by Michael Rudnick

How are these scores produced? →