You are here:

The Sensitives

The Sensitives

Representation Score

7.0/10

Good

2017

TV-14

Director

Drew Xanthopoulos

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The documentary provides a platform for underrepresented voices, particularly those living with misunderstood environmental and sensory disabilities. It avoids exploitative clichés and fosters de-stigmatization. However, the film lacks multi-layered depth, with no explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or racial diversity. The narrative remains centered on a narrow demographic framework, limiting the scope of its social critique. Ultimately, the film succeeds as a character-driven study of neurodivergence and physical sensitivity, challenging institutional authority and traditional domestic roles.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Sensitives have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film centers on traditional family structures, such as patriarchal roles and maternal bonds. There is no explicit mention of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight relationships.

How does The Sensitives portray gender?

Fair

The film challenges passive female stereotypes through Susie Molloy, who is portrayed as proactive and influential. It also critiques traditional patriarchal stability by showing Joe's emotional neglect of his wife.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Sensitives?

Limited

The narrative lacks specific details about the racial or ethnic composition of the subjects. There is no evidence of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority being presented.

How does The Sensitives represent religion and culture?

Good

The story critiques industrial and capitalist structures by validating individual experiences against institutional skepticism. It prioritizes subjective reality over conventional medical or environmental standards.

Does The Sensitives include disability representation?

Excellent

The film focuses on individuals with profound, invisible sensory disabilities, granting them ability to act rather than treating their conditions as mere plot devices.

Present on Screen

  • Provides profound ability to act to individuals living with invisible, debilitating sensory disabilities.
  • Subverts gender stereotypes by featuring a proactive female advocate.
  • Challenges institutional authority by validating non-normative, lived physical experiences.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight relationships.
  • Provides no verifiable evidence of racial or ethnic diversity among the subjects.
  • The narrative focus remains largely within traditional familial and patriarchal frameworks.

Official Synopsis

In Drew Xanthopoulos’ intimate and cinematic documentary, we meet Joe, a patriarch whose affliction is so all-encompassing that he’s indifferent to his long-suffering wife; and twin brothers Sam and Nathan, musicians who are no longer able to breathe outside of their real-life sterile “plastic bubble,” and whose mother, Karen, developed her illness when she was only 17. These characters all suffer from debilitating sensitivities to their environment. Whether from ambient chemicals, genetics, electricity, or even psychogenic reasons, the cause is not clear, but the reality of the effects on these individuals is undeniable. Fortunately, Susie Molloy, a quiet firebrand who is chemically sensitive herself, seeks to help. In her, those afflicted by this modern malady have found an advocate whose mission is to de-stigmatize this community, and in telling their stories, Xanthopoulos has crafted a film itself as deeply sensitive as its title suggests. Cara Cusumano

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.