You are here:
Fortunes

Fortunes

2005

R

Director

Parker Cross

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After an impulsive visit to a fortuneteller, three friends discover that the power of suggestion has forced them to consider the reality of "fate."

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film focuses on the psychological effects of fate among three friends. There is no explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a group navigating existential uncertainty. Without specific character details, the film neither subverts nor reinforces traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The comedy appears to follow a conventional casting structure typical of mid-2000s films. There is no indication of a non-white majority cast or race-bent casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative explores subjective morality and existentialism through the concept of fate. It engages with secular belief systems rather than rigid religious dogma.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The plot does not feature characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Neurodivergence is not presented as a central element of the story.

Strengths

  • The film explores philosophical themes like fate and the power of suggestion.
  • The narrative offers a character-driven look at subjective morality and existentialism.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative dynamics.
  • There is no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the ensemble cast.
  • The story does not incorporate characters with disabilities or neurodivergent perspectives.

AI Analysis

Fortunes functions as a standard character study within the comedy genre. The narrative focuses on the psychological impact of suggestion on a small group of friends, prioritizing existential themes over social commentary. The film lacks intentional intersectional complexity. It follows a conventional structure that does not actively promote diverse identities or provide systemic critiques of social hierarchies. Ultimately, the work remains neutral. It avoids both the active promotion of progressive representation and the overt dismissal of marginalized groups, resulting in a baseline cinematic experience.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.