You are here:

Skin. Like. Sun.

Skin. Like. Sun.

Representation Score

3.6/10

Limited

2009

NR

Director

Jennifer Lyon Bell, Murielle Scherre

Runtime

60 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Skin. Like. Sun. stands out through its experimental documentary format, emphasizing real-time intimacy over traditional cinematic structures. By slowing down the pace, the film resists the commodification of eroticism, allowing for a more nuanced portrayal of human connection. The work succeeds in giving its subjects more control over their bodies through its unique editing style. It avoids the rapid cuts that often lead to the objectification of bodies in similar genres. However, the film's narrow focus on a single couple in a specific location limits its broader representation of diverse identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Skin. Like. Sun. have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film centers on the intimate relationship between Wim and Floor. Though specific sexual orientations are not stated, the film's approach suggests a departure from typical assumptions about heterosexual relationships.

How does Skin. Like. Sun. portray gender?

Fair

The real-time editing style avoids objectifying the subjects. This slower pace allows the subjects to have more control over their bodies and moves away from the aggressive masculine or submissive feminine stereotypes.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Skin. Like. Sun.?

Minimal

The narrative focuses on a specific couple in a Belgian setting. There is no information available to determine the racial or ethnic makeup of the subjects.

How does Skin. Like. Sun. represent religion and culture?

Good

The film prioritizes personal sensory experiences over institutional frameworks. Its rejection of fast-paced editing serves as a subtle critique of modern consumerist media consumption.

Does Skin. Like. Sun. include disability representation?

Minimal

The provided context contains no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • The real-time documentary approach grants subjects more control over their bodies.
  • The slow pacing avoids traditional, objectifying clichés found in erotic media.
  • The film prioritizes personal, sensory experience over institutional frameworks.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks explicit information regarding racial or ethnic diversity.
  • There is no evidence of representation for characters with disabilities.
  • The narrow focus on one couple limits broader representation of diverse identities.

Official Synopsis

Real-life young couple Wim and Floor spend an afternoon in the sunwashed rooms of a crumbling home in Belgium. In a unique twist, this artistic erotic documentary is edited in nearly real-time. In the slowness, we get the build, the sweetness, and the sexiness. Forget about fingersnapping fast editing. Slow is where it’s at.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.