You are here:

STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie

STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie

Representation Score

6.9/10

Good

2023

R

Director

Davis Guggenheim

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Davis Guggenheim’s documentary goes beyond a typical biography to explore the intersection of global fame and chronic neurological conditions. It shifts the focus from a celebrity persona to a multifaceted human experience. The film stands out by avoiding the use of illness for emotional manipulation. Instead, it provides a nuanced look at the ongoing struggle with physical limitations and systemic health issues. While the film doesn’t delve deeply into racial and LGBTQ+ the way different parts of someone's identity overlap, its detailed portrayal of neuro-physical challenges contributes significantly to the discourse on disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not center on queer narratives or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities. It maintains a neutral stance on the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender without actively critiquing it.

How does STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie portray gender?

Fair

The film emphasizes the equal partnership between Michael J. Fox and Tracy Pollan. It breaks down the tough male stereotype by highlighting vulnerability and mutual support.

How racially and ethnically diverse is STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie?

Limited

The film reflects the demographic homogeneity of the 1980s Hollywood ecosystem. It does not actively seek to diversify the lens or promote racial stereotypes.

How does STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary presents a humanist, secular viewpoint on resilience. It centers on individuals' ability to navigate societal pressures and medical challenges.

Does STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie include disability representation?

Excellent

The film's standout feature is its avoidance of 'inspiration porn' by portraying Parkinson’s disease as a central, evolving part of the subject's life rather than just a plot device.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a sophisticated, nuanced portrayal of living with a progressive neurological condition.
  • Avoids 'inspiration porn' by giving the subject significant control and complexity.
  • Breaks down traditional gender roles through the depiction of an equal partnership

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks breadth in addressing racial and ethnic diversity within the narrative.
  • Does not engage with or represent LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Reflects the demographic homogeneity of the 1980s Hollywood era.

Official Synopsis

A short kid from a Canadian army base becomes the international pop culture darling of the 1980s—only to find the course of his life altered by a stunning diagnosis. What happens when an incurable optimist confronts an incurable disease?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.