You are here:
Small Group

Small Group

2018

PG-13

Director

Matt Chastain

Runtime

121 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Documentary filmmaker R. Scott Cooper, on a mission to expose the dark side of Christian culture, infiltrates a small group.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.5/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no discernible LGBTQ+ characters. The narrative focus remains strictly on the domestic and communal bonds of the female ensemble.

Gender Representation

Good

The story centers female intellect and emotional labor as primary plot drivers. By establishing a female-only support system, it disrupts traditional 1960s domestic hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The ensemble is depicted as a homogeneous, white, middle-class group. This lack of intersectional racial diversity results in a lower score for this category.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film critiques 1960s social and medical institutions as insufficient for women's health needs. It focuses on the subjective morality of communal survival.

Disability Representation

Good

Chronic illness is used as a central element of character development rather than a mere plot device. It avoids tropes by focusing on the realistic complexities of illness.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on female agency and intellect.
  • Nuanced portrayal of chronic illness and medical limitations.
  • Effective deconstruction of mid-century social hierarchies.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial and ethnic intersectionality.
  • Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or identity exploration.
  • Limited demographic breadth within the ensemble.

AI Analysis

Small Group is a character-driven study that prioritizes female agency within a mid-century setting. It succeeds in deconstructing the limitations imposed on women by traditional patriarchal frameworks through a focus on collective action. However, the film's progressive reach is limited by its demographic homogeneity. The lack of racial and LGBTQ+ representation prevents a more intersectional exploration of the era's social structures. Ultimately, the work functions as a nuanced look at gendered solidarity, even as it remains confined to a specific, non-diverse social context.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.