You are here:
Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women

Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women

1987

Director

Margaret Lazarus

Runtime

32 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This follow-up to Jean Kilbourne's award-winning 1979 documentary, KILLING US SOFTLY, further probes the harmful effects of stereotypical and sexist images in advertising. Kilbourne conducts a lecture within the film, displaying still images of women, men, children, and violent crime via a slide projector. By emphasizing the dehumanization of women by television's body-image obsession, she teaches viewers how America is taught to categorize women primarily as sex objects.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation


Category Breakdown

Does Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or identities. However, its critique of heteronormative beauty standards and sexualization indirectly addresses the narrow parameters of cisnormative desirability.

How does Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women portray gender?

Excellent

The narrative focuses on subverting traditional gender hierarchies. It critiques how advertising enforces submissive roles for women and challenges the patriarchal dominance found in consumerist imagery.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women?

Fair

The critique of idealized beauty standards touches upon the exclusion of diverse racial phenotypes. However, the film lacks specific evidence of intersectional racial analysis.

How does Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film provides a significant critique of Western consumerist structures. It frames the advertising industry as a systemic force that profits from the dehumanization of individuals.

Does Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women include disability representation?

Fair

The documentary touches on the psychological impact of unrealistic beauty standards. It does not explicitly feature subjects with visible or invisible disabilities as central figures.

Strengths

  • Provides a sophisticated subversion of traditional gender hierarchies and patriarchal dominance.
  • Offers a powerful critique of how Western consumerism and capitalism dehumanize individuals.
  • Effectively deconstructs the visual language of power used in mass media advertising.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit focus on LGBTQ+ narratives or non-conforming identities.
  • Provides limited specific evidence regarding intersectional racial and ethnic analysis.
  • Does not grant agency to subjects with visible or invisible disabilities.

Score Reasoning

This documentary serves as a rigorous intellectual deconstruction of how mass media constructs identity. Its primary strength is the sophisticated interrogation of gendered objectification and the systemic power of the advertising industry. By exposing how capitalism reinforces restrictive hierarchies, the film provides a profound critique of Western social norms. However, the work is specialized in its focus. While it addresses the psychological effects of beauty obsessions, it lacks explicit representation for LGBTQ+ communities and individuals with disabilities. The analysis of race remains secondary to the central gendered critique, limiting its intersectional depth.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.