I Killed Einstein, Gentlemen
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The New Moscow
1938
Director
Aleksandr Medvedkin
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A comedy about a naive young architect and his wild designs for a “New Moscow.” The Soviet censors weren't at all amused and shelved it.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.2/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film contains no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. Given the 1938 Soviet production era, such themes were strictly prohibited by state mandates.
Gender Representation
The narrative focuses on a male architect's professional ambitions. While it may disrupt domestic roles through themes of urban reconstruction, it lacks explicit progressive gender arcs.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film likely reflects the Soviet project of internationalism through a multi-ethnic proletariat. However, it is unclear if this provides meaningful agency or merely symbolic representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film aligns with anti-capitalist frameworks by rejecting Western urbanism. Its suppressed status suggests it challenged rigid Stalinist orthodoxies through a radical, restructured social vision.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's known records.
Strengths
- The film engages with radical anti-capitalist and anti-Western frameworks.
- It explores the deconstruction of traditional institutions through a utopian lens.
- The narrative potentially reflects the multi-ethnic internationalism of the Soviet era.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy.
- Character agency appears limited to male-driven professional and architectural ambitions.
- There is no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
AI Analysis
The film's diversity is defined by its historical context and its status as a suppressed work. While it lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities, its core premise involves a radical reimagining of social structures. The narrative appears centered on male professional ambition and the Soviet ideal of internationalism. This suggests a focus on collective identity and urban reconstruction rather than individual intersectional experiences. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its cultural defiance. By challenging the rigid orthodoxies of the era, it attempts to deconstruct old-world institutions in favor of a contested utopian vision.
Similar Movies
H2S
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
The Three Stooges in Orbit
1962
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
The Invisibles
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.8 out of 10
Cinderella 2000
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Dr. Sex
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Attack of the Giant Mousaka
1999
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.2 out of 10
El arca de Noé
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 0.0 out of 10
This Merry Planet
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
Star Pile
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
The Inventor Crazybrains and His Wonderful Airship
1905
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Flying Saucers
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.