
Speak Up
2017

2017
Director
Amandine Gay
Runtime
122 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The movie focuses on our common identities : “woman” and “black”, whilst highlighting the diversity of Afropean diasporas. This documentary explores the intersections of discrimination, art and blackness.
Overall Score
Excellent
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit character arcs centered on queer identities or non-cisnormative romantic pairings. However, its critique of heteronormative social politeness provides a structural alignment with queer theory.
Gender Representation
Women are portrayed with high agency rather than as passive victims. The narrative centers the female voice as a tool for social correction, subverting tropes of submissive femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentary excels by centering Black, South Asian, and Middle Eastern identities. It offers a nuanced exploration of the Afropean experience that challenges narrow, Anglo-centric definitions of diaspora.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques Western social etiquette, framing traditional politeness as a mechanism for systemic oppression. It prioritizes the lived truths of marginalized groups over established social decorum.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence within the film to determine the presence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Amandine Gay’s documentary is a concentrated study of intersectional identity. It moves beyond simple representation to dismantle the mechanics of casual prejudice through a vignette-based narrative. By focusing on the overlapping experiences of Black women and the Afropean diaspora, the film transforms linguistic microaggressions into a broader critique of systemic power. The work is highly intentional, utilizing diverse characters to disrupt conventional social expectations. Its strength lies in how it explores the intersections of art, Blackness, and the social labor required to navigate systemic hierarchies. While the film is a powerful example of intersectional storytelling, it lacks specific focus on LGBTQ+ character arcs and provides no visible representation of disability.

2017

2011

2020

2018

2016

1989
2014

2018

2008

2013

2022

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.