You are here:
The Hippopotamus

The Hippopotamus

2017

Not Rated

Director

John Jencks

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Disgraced poet Ted Wallace is summoned to his friend's country manor to investigate a series of unexplained miracles.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks verifiable evidence of queer agency or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains on a poet investigating miracles within a manor setting.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a male protagonist, Ted Wallace. While gender hierarchies aren't explicitly addressed, the lead's disgraced status may offer a deconstruction of traditional social authority.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting and character archetypes lean toward Eurocentric tropes. There is no specific information confirming a diverse cast or non-white majority within the production.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The plot engages with spirituality through the lens of unexplained miracles. It pits a skeptical poet against the supernatural, exploring the tension between secularism and religious frameworks.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative does not appear to utilize disability as a central device.

Strengths

  • The central conflict offers a meaningful exploration of the tension between secular skepticism and spiritual miracles.
  • The protagonist's disgraced status provides an opportunity to deconstruct traditional social and professional authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer agency within the narrative.
  • The setting and character archetypes lean heavily toward Eurocentric tropes without confirmed racial diversity.
  • There is no evidence of disability representation or the inclusion of characters with diverse physical or cognitive needs.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a character-driven comedy that prioritizes thematic explorations of belief and social standing. Its narrative structure appears more concerned with the tension between skepticism and the miraculous than with demographic intersectionality. While the protagonist's professional decline offers a potential critique of traditional success, the film lacks documented evidence of systemic identity-driven storytelling. The reliance on classic manor-house tropes suggests a conventional approach to casting and setting. Ultimately, the work lacks the specific, verifiable representation of diverse identities required for a higher progressive rating, focusing instead on niche social dynamics and individual perception.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.