You are here:

11:11

11:11

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

2022

Director

Karim Abouzeid

Runtime

76 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

11:11 serves as a high-concept thriller focused on the chaotic ripple effects of a single violent event. The narrative relies heavily on established genre conventions, emphasizing causality and tension over intentional demographic representation. While the film offers a potential critique of institutional stability through its depiction of a legal professional in crisis, it lacks documented evidence of diverse casting. Character archetypes remain traditional, relying on standard thriller formulas. Ultimately, the film prioritizes situational ethics and moral relativism over the active subversion of social hierarchies or explicit diversity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does 11:11 have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any explicit references to LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. There is no evidence of queer representation within the story.

How does 11:11 portray gender?

Fair

The story centers around a male-dominated professional archetype in a position of authority. It lacks evidence of challenging traditional gender hierarchies or providing diverse female roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is 11:11?

Minimal

The racial and ethnic makeup of the cast is unspecified. While there is potential for diverse casting, there is no specific mention of non-Anglo-Saxon representation.

How does 11:11 represent religion and culture?

Fair

The plot delves into moral complexity and the instability of social institutions through a legal professional's crisis. This focus on situational ethics adds some cultural depth.

Does 11:11 include disability representation?

Limited

The protagonist's 'troubled' status suggests mental health issues, but it is unclear if this is handled with nuance. The film may use psychological distress simply as a plot device.

Present on Screen

  • The narrative explores complex moral relativism and the unintended consequences of individual actions.
  • The premise offers a potential critique of Western institutional stability through the lens of a professional crisis.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks explicit evidence of diverse casting or racial and ethnic representation.
  • The depiction of mental health remains ambiguous and may rely on character shorthand rather than nuanced portrayal.
  • The narrative leans on traditional gendered archetypes without challenging established social hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

When a troubled lawyer attempts suicide in his car, the stray bullet triggers a series of events intertwining the lives of three strangers.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.