You are here:

Sideburns

Sideburns

Representation Score

5.4/10

Fair

1990

Director

Yuri Mamin

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Sideburns is a dark satire of the late Perestroika era, prioritizing a critique of systemic power over demographic variety. It succeeds as a cultural study, using postmodern relativism to dismantle the concept of institutional stability and patriotism. However, the film remains largely homogeneous and male-centric. The focus on masculine struggles for order and the absence of diverse racial or sexual identities limits its demographic breadth. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual deconstruction of a collapsing society rather than its representation of varied human identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Sideburns have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film doesn't include explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or non-cisgender identities. Conflicts between subcultures like punks and bodybuilders focus on lifestyle and beliefs rather than sexual orientation.

How does Sideburns portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on male-dominated power structures and teenage gang rivalries. It shows the erosion of traditional male authority figures but lacks nuanced women's ability to drive the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Sideburns?

Limited

Set in a provincial Soviet context, the film reflects a homogeneous demographic. The narrative focuses on socio-political and class-based tensions rather than ethnic diversity.

How does Sideburns represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels at deconstructing traditional institutions and patriotism. It critiques failing social codes and the absurdity of organized ideology during a period of systemic collapse.

Does Sideburns include disability representation?

Fair

A protagonist's history with a psychiatric institution serves as a central thread. This portrayal highlights the absurdity of state social control rather than mocking mental health issues.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated deconstruction of traditional institutions and social codes.
  • Uses psychiatric history to critique state social control mechanisms.
  • Sharp satirical critique of patriotism and organized ideology.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks nuanced women's ability to drive the story within the narrative.
  • Minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender characters.
  • Homogeneous demographic focus with little racial or ethnic diversity.

Official Synopsis

A small provincial town is home to two rival teenage gangs, one devoted to loose living and punk music and the other a collection of narrow-minded bodybuilders obsessed with order and convinced of their own moral rectitude. However, this cosy state of affairs is upset by the arrival of two strangers dressed like Pushkin, the famous early 19th century Russian poet, who proceed to found their own organisation, dedicated ostensibly to the memory of the great writer and the "salvation of Russia". Gradually, they begin to assume control of the town...

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.