You are here:

Miracle on Everest

Miracle on Everest

Representation Score

5.0/10

Fair

2008

Director

Jennifer Peedom

Runtime

52 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Miracle on Everest disrupts the typical 'Western explorer' narrative by highlighting the Sherpa community as key players in survival scenarios. Instead of relegating indigenous climbers to secondary roles, the film emphasizes their expertise and influence. However, the documentary maintains a traditional gender structure, with a focus on male-dominated mountaineering that limits female involvement in the central survival storyline. Overall, the film serves as a nuanced critique of the commercialization of expeditions. It delves into the tension between wealthy Western clients and the local guides who face the human costs of high-altitude commercial activities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Miracle on Everest have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses solely on the physical challenges of a high-altitude survival mission and does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives about non-straight relationships.

How does Miracle on Everest portray gender?

Limited

The story centers around a traditionally masculine environment, primarily featuring male climbers and guides. Female characters play a minor role in the central survival narrative, reflecting the demographics of the time.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Miracle on Everest?

Excellent

The documentary highlights the Sherpa community, emphasizing their crucial role in the survival of the main character. It showcases their expertise and control in critical decision-making situations.

How does Miracle on Everest represent religion and culture?

Good

The film explores the power dynamics and economic disparities within the commercialized guide industry. It critiques the capitalist emphasis on individual Western success over the well-being of local guides and overall safety.

Does Miracle on Everest include disability representation?

Fair

The film provides a detailed examination of acute neurological damage due to low oxygen levels. It portrays Lincoln Hall’s cognitive decline seriously, focusing on the biological impact of his condition.

Present on Screen

  • Highlights the Sherpa community's expertise and control in survival scenarios.
  • Critiques the commercialization of Mount Everest with sophistication.
  • Examines acute neurological damage with biological accuracy.

Limited or Absent

  • Includes minimal female representation in the central survival narrative.
  • Does not feature any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives.

Official Synopsis

2006 was one of the deadliest Everest seasons on record. Experienced mountaineer Lincoln Hall was invited to join an expedition as a high altitude cameraman. It was his second attempt to summit the mountain, having turned back just short 22 years earlier. Shortly after reaching the summit, Hall began to behave irrationally, suffering from lack of oxygen. Aided by his loyal Sherpas for over 9 hours, he eventually collapsed and they declared him dead. His family were informed and the news hit headlines. But something happened that night that science cannot explain. The next morning Lincoln Hall was found alive by approaching climbers and his dramatic rescue began. Never before has a man been declared dead so high on Everest and survived. This is the remarkable true story of Lincoln Hall’s extraordinary journey back from beyond.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.