
Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon
2008

2008
TV-MADirector
Jeffrey Schwarz
Runtime
56 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
From the moment Shakespeare wrote his first fart joke, audiences have loved gross-out humor. In this 'Starz Inside' documentary, take a trip through the history of taboo-busting comedy that began with slapstick and led to the most notorious Internet video in history, with stops at every infamous penis, poo, puke and pie gag in-between. It’s a totally uncensored look at the scenes that make you want to look away.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores transgressive comedy that historically intersects with queer subcultures. However, it lacks specific evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that actively critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The documentary examines the evolution of slapstick and gross-out gags. While the uncensored content challenges traditional standards of polite behavior, there is no clear evidence of subverting gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
This historical survey of comedic genres lacks explicit mention of a diverse or non-white majority cast. There is no evidence of race-bent casting or racial metaphors within the material.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques traditional Western standards of civilized behavior and propriety. By celebrating taboo humor, the film prioritizes an irreverent, secular approach over traditional moral frameworks.
Disability Representation
The film provides no information regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. No specific representation of these identities is present in the documentation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Jeffrey Schwarz’s documentary serves as a genre study of transgressive media rather than a vehicle for intersectional storytelling. It focuses on the history of taboo-busting humor, from slapstick to viral internet videos, prioritizing the disruption of social etiquette over identity-based narratives. The film's strength lies in its subversion of institutionalized politeness and Western standards of decorum. By celebrating the 'uncensored,' it challenges the boundaries of acceptable public discourse. However, the work lacks explicit character development or systemic narratives centered on marginalized identities. The focus remains on the mechanics of gross-out comedy rather than the diverse lived experiences of the performers involved.

2008

2007

2012

2012

2013

2007
1999

2004

2000

2009

2013

1964
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.