
For 80 Days
2010

2017
Director
Cesare Furesi
Runtime
103 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The melting love story between two old men, one of them is sick and stays in bed all day, the other is a gambler who takes care of him, visit him everyday and has a hard relationship with his daughter. Sometimes love is the only solution but we realize it when it's too late.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers a romantic bond between two elderly men. This focus challenges heteronormative expectations by exploring queer companionship and emotional interdependence through the lens of caretaking.
Gender Representation
Masculinity is portrayed through vulnerability and domesticity rather than traditional strength. The characters subvert the stable patriarch archetype by navigating dysfunction and complex interpersonal struggles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focus remains strictly on the interpersonal dynamics of the central trio. There is insufficient information to confirm the racial composition of the cast or ethnic backgrounds.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores non-traditional family structures and subjective morality. It prioritizes unconventional bonds over societal expectations, framing interpersonal dysfunction as a core part of the human condition.
Disability Representation
Chronic illness and physical frailty are central to the plot. The film depicts the grueling, day-to-day reality of caretaking for a character confined to bed by sickness.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Who Will Save The Roses? succeeds in disrupting traditional cinematic tropes by centering the emotional lives of elderly, queer-coded characters. It moves away from youthful romance to explore the intimacy of long-term interdependence and the realities of aging. The film provides a grounded look at disability and caretaking, avoiding sentimentality in favor of depicting the physical limitations of illness. It also offers a fractured view of masculinity, replacing the provider archetype with characters defined by vulnerability. However, the film operates within a narrow domestic scope. While it excels in depth regarding its central characters, it lacks broad demographic breadth and provides no clarity regarding racial or ethnic diversity.

2010

2005

2014

2021

2007

2015

2012

2015

2017

2017

2013

2025
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.