You are here:
It Was Always Me: Behind the Story

It Was Always Me: Behind the Story

2022

TV-MA

Director

Marco Colantoni

Runtime

31 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Karol Sevilla and Pipe Bueno talk about their on-screen chemistry and the challenge Pipe faced when taking on a lead role. Christian Tappan talks about how he took on the challenge of representing his character. Exclusive off-screen material, videos recorded by the actors themselves on their phones, and records of castings and rehearsals will be unveiled.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The focus remains on the professional chemistry between the leads, Sevilla and Bueno, without addressing queer themes.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film highlights Karol Sevilla's professional agency and centers her perspective. While it avoids traditional hierarchies by weighing male and female struggles equally, it leans into traditional interpersonal dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The production centers Latin American performers, providing a platform for these actors to discuss their craft. This elevates non-Anglo-Saxon voices within the mainstream media industry.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

By using self-recorded footage, the film disrupts controlled Western institutional models of media production. It moves toward decentralized storytelling, though it avoids specific secularist or anti-capitalist themes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters or subjects are identified as having disabilities in the provided material.

Strengths

  • Centers Latin American performers and elevates non-Anglo-Saxon voices.
  • Provides a transparent look at the creative process through raw, unmediated footage.
  • Avoids traditional gender hierarchies by weighing the professional struggles of all leads equally.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit engagement with LGBTQ+ narratives or queer themes.
  • Does not address or represent visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Fails to subvert traditional gendered power structures or interpersonal dynamics.

AI Analysis

The documentary serves as a professional retrospective that strips away polished industry veneers. It succeeds by centering Latin American talent and offering a transparent, unmediated look at the creative process through raw, actor-recorded footage. However, the film lacks engagement with intersectional identity politics. It functions primarily as a look at professional craft rather than a tool for subverting social hierarchies or addressing specific identity-driven narratives. Ultimately, while it provides meaningful representation for its cast, the absence of queer themes or disability representation keeps the score in a moderate range.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.