You are here:
Gorenos

Gorenos

2016

Director

Clarence Williams IV

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Miles is haunted by a supernatural entity in the wake of his 18th birthday

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that challenge heteronormativity. The focus remains on a singular supernatural arc.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on a male protagonist, Miles. While female performers are in the cast, their agency and character depth remain unconfirmed.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast features a multi-ethnic array of names, suggesting a departure from homogeneous casting. However, the specific distribution of these roles is unknown.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The premise follows conventional horror tropes regarding supernatural hauntings. There is no explicit evidence of specific anti-institutional or secularist themes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the depiction of neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions.

Strengths

  • The cast features a multi-ethnic ensemble, moving away from homogeneous casting patterns.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative characters.
  • The story is heavily centered on a single male protagonist, limiting female agency.
  • There is no visible inclusion of characters with disabilities or neurodivergent traits.

AI Analysis

Gorenos operates as a traditional character-driven horror film centered on a singular protagonist's transition into adulthood. While the production avoids homogeneous casting by including a multi-ethnic ensemble, the narrative architecture remains narrow. The film lacks visible intersectional depth, focusing instead on a standard supernatural arc. This concentration on a single male lead limits the opportunity for broader social critique or diverse character agency. Ultimately, the film provides moderate racial inclusion but fails to engage with LGBTQ+ identities or disability representation, adhering to established genre conventions.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.