You are here:

AE-Autoexposure

Name: AE-Autoexposure
Director: Juliana Reis
Released: 2012
Duration: 78 min

Representation Score

4.6/10

Fair

2012

Director

Juliana Reis

Runtime

78 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

AE-Autoexposure is a gritty crime thriller that prioritizes systemic dysfunction over identity-based representation. The narrative focuses heavily on a singular male experience, leaving little room for gender or LGBTQ+ exploration. The film finds its strength in cultural critique, challenging the reliability of justice and public institutions. It uses urban violence to highlight the entrapment of individuals within corrupt or failing social structures. While the setting suggests potential for exploring socioeconomic disparities, the lack of specific character details limits the film's measurable diversity impact.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does AE-Autoexposure have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include explicit representations of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities. The story focuses on a localized crime thriller rather than addressing these specific identity markers.

How does AE-Autoexposure portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on Henrique, a male protagonist navigating victimization and legal issues. There is no evidence of women's ability to drive the story or the deconstruction of traditional masculine leadership roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is AE-Autoexposure?

Fair

The setting involves urban violence and public institutions, reflecting socioeconomic disparities. However, there are no specific racial blending or diverse casting details mentioned in the narrative.

How does AE-Autoexposure represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques the efficacy of traditional legal systems through a self-appointed avenger. It portrays civic institutions like police stations and hospitals as inherently fraught or corrupt.

Does AE-Autoexposure include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative.

Present on Screen

Challenges the reliability of traditional social and legal institutions.
Uses urban violence to highlight systemic failures.
Critiques the hero cliché through a morally ambiguous protagonist.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender characters.
Offers limited opportunities for women's ability to drive the story or gender subversion.
Does not provide specific details regarding racial or ethnic diversity in casting.

Official Synopsis

After a shooting assignment, Henrique is mugged by two armed motor-bikers who steal his camera and speed off. Seconds later, he watches both get hit by a pickup truck driven by a self-appointed avenger, someone weary of feeling defenseless against the urban violence, and who decided to take action. Henrique recovers his stolen equipment and leaves, feeling avenged. But he goes back to find the memory card, with the photos, lost during the crash. From that moment, he is trapped in a situation where he is now the criminal for failing to rescue a victim, who had been his aggressor. Going from the murder scene to the police station, and then to the emergency ward of the public hospital, he attempts to clear himself.

How are these scores produced? →