You are here:

P & B

P & B

Representation Score

6.0/10

Good

1983

Director

Hans Alfredson

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Hans Alfredson’s *P & B* is a satirical examination of institutional stability. It uses the Theatre of the Absurd to explore the tension between individual actions and systemic control, prioritizing a critique of power structures over traditional character development. Though the film lacks broad representation of race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identities, it excels in its complex narrative structure. It challenges conventional social hierarchies and the idea of the state as a benevolent force. The work stands out as a postmodern critique of centralized power, using the protagonists' fight against social decay to highlight the absurdity of totalitarian control.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does P & B have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film doesn't show non-straight or non-cisgender identities explicitly. It focuses on the close friendship between two older men.

How does P & B portray gender?

Fair

The story mainly centers around two elderly men, with very few roles for women. This limits the exploration of gender issues and female perspectives.

How racially and ethnically diverse is P & B?

Limited

The cast seems uniform within a specific European context. The story emphasizes class and age over racial diversity or varied cultural backgrounds.

How does P & B represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively critiques established institutions and state authority through satire. It highlights moral ambiguity to question singular institutional morality, favoring situational ethics.

Does P & B include disability representation?

Fair

Characters are defined by the challenges of aging and socioeconomic struggles. The film avoids portraying them as inspirational figures, focusing instead on the resilience needed to cope with societal decline.

Present on Screen

  • Critique of state authority and systemic power dynamics
  • Use of satire to challenge traditional institutional morality
  • Portrayal of resilience in the face of socioeconomic and aging challenges

Limited or Absent

  • Limited exploration of gender issues and female perspectives
  • Uniform casting that misses opportunities for racial and ethnic diversity
  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight identities

Official Synopsis

Pettersson and Bendel are both worn, run-down and broke. Despite this they decide to start a business and become rich. Unexperienced they are open to any deal. They tamper, scam and exploit loopholes that exist.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.