Lucky Luke and the Daltons
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Pocket Money
1972
PGDirector
Stuart Rosenberg
Runtime
102 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Broke and in debt, an otherwise honest cowboy and his buddy get mixed up in some shady dealings with a crooked cattle dealer.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.2/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film follows conventional heteronormative structures typical of 1972. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male-centric duo consisting of a cowboy and his buddy. It leans into traditional masculine-driven adventure tropes without showing female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The plot involves frontier lawlessness, which often allows for diverse roles. However, there is no explicit evidence of a non-white majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film acts as a morality play regarding debt and honesty. It critiques economic corruption but lacks deep systemic or anti-capitalist deconstruction.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent traits.
Strengths
- Explores themes of individual morality versus institutional greed.
- Engages with the universal struggle of economic survival and debt.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or LGBTQ+ characters.
- Relies on male-centric tropes with limited female agency.
- Does not provide explicit evidence of racial or ethnic diversity.
AI Analysis
Pocket Money is a traditional Western comedy that prioritizes individual struggle against economic misfortune. The narrative focuses on the friction between honest protagonists and corrupt institutional figures, such as a crooked cattle dealer. While the film engages with themes of morality and systemic corruption, it remains within established genre frameworks. It does not significantly disrupt social hierarchies or prioritize intersectional representation. The film reflects the standard cinematic landscape of the early 1970s, focusing on character-driven comedy rather than sociopolitical deconstruction.
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.