You are here:
Cirrhosis of the Louvre

Cirrhosis of the Louvre

1966

Approved

Director

Gerry Chiniquy

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The Inspector and Sergeant Deux-Deux ineffectually try to stop the Blotch from robbing the Louvre.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.1/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. Characters are defined solely by their functional roles in a law enforcement versus antagonist conflict.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative relies on traditional authority archetypes like the Inspector and Sergeant. There is no indication of female characters or the subversion of mid-century gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The story focuses on a conflict at the Louvre but provides no details regarding racial or ethnic composition. No intersectional representation is present in the character descriptions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot follows conventional Western tropes of maintaining institutional order. It lacks themes that challenge social hierarchies or offer diverse cultural perspectives beyond a standard procedural setup.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The film does not utilize neurodivergence or disability as a narrative element.

Strengths

  • The film utilizes established, recognizable archetypes of law enforcement and criminal antagonists.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks diverse character identities, including varied gender, racial, or LGBTQ+ representation.
  • There is no evidence of characters with disabilities or neurodivergent perspectives.
  • The story follows conventional Western tropes without challenging institutional or social hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Cirrhosis of the Louvre is a mid-century animated short that follows a standard slapstick or procedural structure. The plot centers on a conflict between law enforcement figures and a criminal element attempting to rob a national landmark. The film adheres to traditionalist animation tropes, focusing on the preservation of order. Because the characters are defined by their roles rather than their identities, there is a notable absence of diverse social or personal backgrounds. Ultimately, the work lacks the progressive narrative architecture or intersectional character development required for a higher diversity rating, functioning instead as a conventional conflict between authority and disorder.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.