You are here:

Contra

Name: Contra
Director: Sönke Wortmann
Released: 2020
Duration: 104 min

Representation Score

5.8/10

Fair

2020

Director

Sönke Wortmann

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Contra serves as a critique of institutional inertia, focusing on the clash between academic authority and modern social accountability. The plot uses a viral moment of racialized outburst to disrupt the perceived sanctity of the university setting. The film moves away from traditional hero-centric clichés to highlight the disruptive power of social accountability. It emphasizes how underrepresented voices can challenge established power structures through digital and interpersonal friction. While the film excels in exploring racial dynamics and systemic bias, it lacks depth in other areas of identity, such as LGBTQ+ representation or disability visibility.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Contra have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses mainly on racial and generational conflicts. There is little evidence of non-traditional gender identities or queer themes in the central storyline.

How does Contra portray gender?

Fair

The movie challenges traditional male-dominated academic hierarchies through interactions between Naima and Pohl. Female leaders play a crucial role in addressing the social consequences of the professor’s actions.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Contra?

Good

The film shows strong intentionality in handling racial dynamics. By making Naima a central driver of the plot, the story gives a underrepresented character significant influence against a dominant institutional figure.

How does Contra represent religion and culture?

Good

The story questions the authority of Western academia. It portrays the university as a flawed institution, emphasizing modern social accountability over traditional academic immunity.

Does Contra include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or mentioned depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities that affect the narrative.

Present on Screen

Strong focus on racial dynamics and systemic bias.
Gives significant influence to the underrepresented character, Naima.
Uses modern digital clichés effectively to show power shifts.

Limited or Absent

Needs more explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
Lacks visible depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Gender dynamics remain closely tied to the primary racial conflict.

Official Synopsis

With his uncouth manner, Professor Pohl doesn’t enjoy the best reputation at the university where he works. To make matters worse, he makes a racist remark when student Naima arrives late for his lecture. Unfortunately for him, a video of his verbal outburst spreads like wildfire on the Internet, and the university’s president, Lambrecht, is called to deal with the incident. But Pohl is not dismissed. Instead, he is put to the task of helping Naima prepare for an important debating competition. The lecturer and the student could not be more different, yet they are thrown together to work as a team.

How are these scores produced? →