You are here:

Tangerines

Tangerines

Representation Score

5.1/10

Fair

2013

PG-13

Director

Zaza Urushadze

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Tangerines is a humanist deconstruction of ethnic conflict that prioritizes individual morality over nationalistic fervor. It excels in its nuanced portrayal of racial and cultural identities, using the closeness of opposing groups to critique the artificiality of borders. However, the film's impact is constrained by a lack of gender diversity and the absence of LGBTQ+ representation. Its narrative operates within a male-dominated space dictated by its wartime setting, limiting a broader exploration of the conflict's social dimensions. Overall, the film offers a powerful examination of identity politics and the erosion of social order, despite its narrow demographic focus.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Tangerines have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story centers on survival and relationships among the main characters.

How does Tangerines portray gender?

Limited

The narrative focuses primarily on male characters, reflecting the combat-driven nature of the Abkhazian conflict. While it avoids overly aggressive male leadership, it does not challenge existing gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Tangerines?

Good

The film stands out by examining the tensions between Georgian and Abkhazian identities. It avoids simplistic ethnic stereotypes, offering nuanced portrayals that question nationalist divisions.

How does Tangerines represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story emphasizes individual humanism over state-sanctioned allegiances. It criticizes traditional authority and nationalist claims by highlighting the importance of hospitality over political loyalty.

Does Tangerines include disability representation?

Fair

Wounded soldiers bring up themes of physical vulnerability and care. These characters are portrayed with dignity, emphasizing the human cost of war through their physical conditions.

Present on Screen

  • Nuanced exploration of complex ethnic identities and characters.
  • Strong critique of nationalist structures through a focus on individual humanism.
  • Respectful portrayal of physical vulnerability and the human cost of war.

Limited or Absent

  • Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight narratives.
  • Over-reliance on male-dominated perspectives and character types.
  • Limited exploration of gender hierarchies outside the immediate wartime context.

Official Synopsis

War in Abkhazia, 1992. An Estonian man Ivo has stayed behind to harvest his crops of tangerines. In a bloody conflict at his door, a wounded man is left behind, and Ivo is forced to take him in.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.