You are here:

Living on One Dollar

Name: Living on One Dollar
Director: Sean Leonard, Chris Temple, Zach Ingrasci
Released: 2013
Duration: 56 min

Representation Score

6.9/10

Good

2013

Director

Sean Leonard, Chris Temple, Zach Ingrasci

Runtime

56 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Living on One Dollar disrupts the typical 'savior' narrative by putting Western participants in economically dependent situations. It shifts the focus to the resilience of the local Guatemalan community, offering a critical view of global wealth disparities and systemic poverty. However, the film's approach to diversity is uneven. While it effectively addresses racial and cultural representation through its anti-capitalist lens, it does not intentionally explore LGBTQ+ identities or neurodivergence. Gender representation is observed rather than challenged. Overall, the documentary is a strong example of socially conscious non-fiction that prioritizes the resilience of the local community over the perspectives of Western travelers.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Living on One Dollar have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not focus on LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight gender expressions. Instead, it centers on the survival challenges faced by rural Guatemalans.

How does Living on One Dollar portray gender?

Fair

The documentary highlights the gender roles and domestic responsibilities of women in poor communities. It captures these dynamics without explicitly challenging them.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Living on One Dollar?

Excellent

The film shines by focusing on the daily lives of Guatemalan people. Community members like Rosa, Anthony, and Chino take the lead in telling their stories.

How does Living on One Dollar represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques global capitalism and systemic economic failures. It emphasizes the strength and resilience of the community over individual success.

Does Living on One Dollar include disability representation?

Fair

The film shows physical health issues like E. coli and malnutrition as results of poverty. It does not specifically explore neurodiversity or permanent disabilities.

Present on Screen

Disrupts the 'savior' narrative by highlighting the ability to act of local Guatemalan community members.
Provides a critical view of global capitalist structures and systemic economic inequality.
Offers an authentic glimpse into the daily lives and resilience of non-Western populations.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation or exploration of LGBTQ+ identities and non-straight gender expressions.
Does not intentionally address neurodiversity or permanent disabilities within the narrative.
Gender representation remains observational of existing social structures rather than challenging them.

Official Synopsis

How do 1.1 billion people around the world live on less than one dollar a day? Four young friends set out to research and live this reality. Armed with only a video camera and a desire to understand, they spend just 56 dollars each for 56 days in rural Pena Blanca, Guatemala. They battle E.Coli, financial stress, and the realization that there are no easy answers. Yet, the generosity and strength of their neighbors, Rosa, Anthony and Chino gives them resilient hope. They return home transformed and embark on a mission to share their new found understanding with other students, inspiring and challenging their generation to make a difference.

How are these scores produced? →