After Truth: Disinformation and the Cost of Fake News
2020
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.0 out of 10
You are here:
Hoaxed
Representation Score
2.4/10
Limited
2019
Not RatedDirector
Scooter Downey, Jon du Toit
Runtime
125 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Hoaxed functions as a technical and psychological investigation into the nature of belief and media authenticity. It succeeds in deconstructing established facts and questioning the reliability of visual evidence through a postmodern lens. However, the film lacks the intentionality required to challenge systemic social hierarchies. The focus remains strictly on the mechanics of misinformation rather than multi-layered identity politics. Ultimately, the documentary serves a niche investigative purpose that does not prioritize or promote progressive social representation.
Category Breakdown
Does Hoaxed have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film focuses solely on the forensic investigation of cryptid sightings and media misinformation. It does not include any characters or narratives related to LGBTQ+ identities.
How does Hoaxed portray gender?
The documentary emphasizes intellectual inquiry rather than traditional gender roles. It does not explicitly challenge gender hierarchies or provide clear data on the gender distribution of its subjects.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Hoaxed?
The subject matter centers on North American wilderness and Bigfoot sightings, a field traditionally dominated by Western, Anglo-centric perspectives. There are no high-profile characters of color.
How does Hoaxed represent religion and culture?
The narrative questions long-held cultural icons and disrupts conventional expectations of truth. However, it does not explicitly promote anti-Western institutional critiques.
Does Hoaxed include disability representation?
The investigative framework does not address neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions. These topics are not used as central narrative drivers.
Present on Screen
- The film effectively uses postmodern skepticism to challenge the validity of long-held cultural icons and historical certainties.
- The narrative structure successfully deconstructs the mechanics of misinformation and the psychology of belief.
Limited or Absent
- The film lacks intentionality regarding progressive social representation or the subversion of systemic hierarchies.
- The subject matter remains tethered to traditional, Anglo-centric perspectives within the cryptozoology community.
- There is a complete absence of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disability-related narratives.
Official Synopsis
An insider's look at the fake news phenomenon and the consequences of media misinformation. Interviews from those who have been accused of spreading it themselves are featured in variety throughout the film.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
The Yes Men Fix the World
2009
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.1 out of 10
Our New President
2018
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.2 out of 10
Collective
2019
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.6 out of 10
Plot to Overturn the Election
2022
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.9 out of 10
The Yes Men
2003
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.0 out of 10
Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer
2019
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.2 out of 10
The Mole: Undercover in North Korea
2020
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.