You are here:

The Best Two Years

The Best Two Years

Representation Score

2.4/10

Limited

2004

PG

Director

Scott S. Anderson

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Best Two Years is a niche, character-driven comedy-drama that functions primarily as a study of a specific religious subculture. The narrative structure reinforces traditional social and religious hierarchies rather than challenging them. Representation is limited by a focus on Western, Anglo-centric demographics and a predominantly male cast. The interpersonal dynamics revolve around institutional advancement and conventional romantic structures within a religious framework. Ultimately, the film lacks complexity in representing multiple aspects of identity, prioritizing the preservation of institutional values and traditional social roles over progressive or diverse storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Best Two Years have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film explores romantic disillusionment through Elder Rogers, who struggles after his girlfriend marries another man. However, the narrative lacks representation of non-binary or transgender identities and does not critique the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does The Best Two Years portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on a male-dominated cast of missionaries and their internal hierarchies. There is little evidence of women taking a leading role or challenging traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Best Two Years?

Limited

Set in the Netherlands with American missionaries, the film focuses on a Western, Anglo-centric demographic. It lacks a diverse cast with significant racial complexity.

How does The Best Two Years represent religion and culture?

Limited

The plot is deeply embedded in LDS traditions and institutional hierarchies. It prioritizes religious morality and missionary duties over critiques of Western or religious structures.

Does The Best Two Years include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions. No disability-driven narratives are present in the text.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a specific, character-driven look into the unique subculture of Mormon missionary life.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing on a narrow Anglo-centric demographic.
  • Features a male-centric cast with minimal women's ability to drive the story or presence.
  • Does not explore non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities or diverse romantic structures.
  • Fails to engage with disability-driven narratives or neurodivergent perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Two pairs of Mormon missionaries from America live in a beaten-up apartment in the Dutch city of Haarlem. Their personalities are distinctly different. Elder Johnson is the District Leader and oversees their efforts. His companion, the vain Elder Van Pelt, seeks to become the assistant to the mission president (the top post available) as soon as possible. The capable Elder Rogers has become disillusioned and inattentive to his duties ever since a previous missionary companion returned to America and married Elder Roger's girlfriend. The three meet Elder Roger's new companion, Elder Calhoun, in the train station. This new elder is a nerdy but enthusiastic "greenie" that has just arrived from the Missionary Training Center (MTC) in Utah. Unfortunately, his training did not give him much fluency in the Dutch language. But as luck would have it, the first person he approaches to proselytize is a fellow American named Kyle.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.