
Go Further
2003

2006
Not RatedDirector
William Gazecki
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Future by Design shares the life and far-reaching vision of Jacque Fresco, considered by many to be a modern day Da Vinci. Peer to Einstein and Buckminster Fuller, Jacque is a self-taught futurist who describes himself most often as a "generalist" or multi-disciplinarian -- a student of many inter-related fields.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film maintains a neutral stance regarding queer identities. It focuses on systemic futurism and scientific visions rather than exploring LGBTQ+ character arcs or interpersonal dynamics.
Gender Representation
The documentary suggests a subversion of gendered labor divisions through Fresco's multi-disciplinarian approach. However, it lacks specific evidence regarding female agency or the disruption of domestic hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative centers on the intellectual legacy of a single individual. It does not appear to prioritize a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast or utilize race-bent casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels by critiquing Western institutions like capitalism and scarcity-based economies. It promotes a secular, technocratic vision that deconstructs traditional religious and patriotic social pillars.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence that neurodivergence or physical disabilities serve as central themes or plot devices within this documentary.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Future by Design is a specialized biographical documentary that prioritizes philosophical and systemic revisionism over demographic representation. It functions as a critique of modern civilization, challenging Western industrial and capitalist hierarchies through the lens of Jacque Fresco's futurist visions. The film's progressive impact is found in its narrative architecture rather than intersectional character studies. By advocating for resource-based social structures, it disrupts conventional notions of meritocracy and private property. While the work lacks diverse interpersonal storytelling, it succeeds in its radical deconstruction of existing cultural and economic frameworks.

2003

2003

2004

2007

1984

1997

2018

2007

2017

2012

2012

2016
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.