You are here:
November Criminals

November Criminals

2017

PG-13

Director

Sacha Gervasi

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

When Addison investigates the murder of his friend Kevin with the help of Phoebe, they discover that the truth is darker than they had ever imagined.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film explores adolescent intimacy and conformity within a 1960s boarding school. However, it lacks explicit non-cisnormative identity markers, relying instead on subtext rather than overt character identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Phoebe acts as a vital investigative partner to Addison, providing necessary agency. Despite this, the plot remains centered on male-dominated social conflicts and traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Set in a homogenous 1960s British elite school, the cast is predominantly white and Anglo-Saxon. The film uses this lack of diversity to emphasize the insular nature of the class.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative excels at critiquing Western institutions and the British class system. It portrays elite educational structures as sites of corruption, hypocrisy, and systemic secrecy.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central character arcs or plot drivers.

Strengths

  • Strong critique of established Western institutions and the British class system.
  • Effective portrayal of systemic corruption and hypocrisy within elite social circles.
  • Thematic focus on youthful rebellion against rigid social structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the central cast.
  • Minimal explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • Reliance on traditional gender hierarchies despite female agency in the mystery.

AI Analysis

November Criminals is a sociological critique of class and institutional integrity rather than a study in demographic intersectionality. Its strength lies in its skepticism of authority and its deconstruction of traditional Western hierarchies. While the film offers a sharp look at the corruption inherent in elite, traditionalist structures, it remains limited by its period setting. The lack of racial and LGBTQ+ visibility prevents a more balanced representation. Ultimately, the film's progressive value is found in its moral relativism and its portrayal of youthful rebellion against institutional oversight.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.